2022/11/11 by Roxana Zeraati, Zeraati, Roxana, Victor Buendía +5
Medicine · Neuroscience · #Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications #Disordered Systems and Neural Networks (cond-mat.dis-nn) #FOS: Biological sciences #FOS: Physical sciences #Functional Brain Connectivity Studies #Neural dynamics and brain function #Neurons and Cognition (q-bio.NC) #Statistical Mechanics (cond-mat.stat-mech)
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.06296
openalex publication_date 2022/11/11 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Multiple studies of neural avalanches across different data modalities led to the prominent hypothesis that the brain operates near a critical point. The observed exponents often indicate the mean-field directed-percolation universality class, leading to the fully-connected or random network models to study the avalanche dynamics. However, the cortical networks have distinct non-random features and spatial organization that is known to affect the critical exponents. Here we show that distinct empirical exponents arise in networks with different topology and depend on the network size. In particular, we find apparent scale-free behavior with mean-field exponents appearing as quasi-critical dynamics in structured networks. This quasi-critical dynamics cannot be easily discriminated from an actual critical point in small networks. We find that the local coalescence in activity dynamics can explain the distinct exponents. Therefore, both topology and system size should be considered when assessing criticality from empirical observables.