vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Architecture-Aware Generalization Bounds for Temporal Networks: Theory and Fair Comparison Methodology

2025/08/08 by Gahtan, Barak, Bronstein, Alex M.
#Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG)

paper · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.06066

Abstract

Deep temporal architectures such as TCNs achieve strong predictive performance on sequential data, yet theoretical understanding of their generalization remains limited. We address this gap through three contributions: introducing an evaluation methodology for temporal models, revealing surprising empirical phenomena about temporal dependence, and the first architecture-aware theoretical framework for dependent sequences. Fair-Comparison Methodology. We introduce evaluation protocols that fix effective sample size Neff to isolate temporal structure effects from information content. Empirical Findings. Applying this method reveals that under Neff = 2000, strongly dependent sequences (ρ= 0.8) exhibit approx' 76% smaller generalization gaps than weakly dependent ones (ρ= 0.2), challenging the conventional view that dependence universally impedes learning. However, observed convergence rates (Neff-1.21 to Neff-0.89) significantly exceed theoretical worst-case predictions (N-0.5), revealing that temporal architectures exploit problem structure in ways current theory does not capture. Lastly, we develop the first architecture-aware generalization bounds for deep temporal models on exponentially β-mixing sequences. By embedding Golowich et al.'s i.i.d. class bound within a novel blocking scheme that partitions N samples into approx' B ≈ N/log N quasi-independent blocks, we establish polynomial sample complexity under convex Lipschitz losses. The framework achieves √(D) depth scaling alongside the product of layer-wise norms R = ∏ℓ=1D M(ℓ), avoiding exponential dependence. While these bounds are conservative, they prove learnability and identify architectural scaling laws, providing worst-case baselines that highlight where future theory must improve.

Citations

Related