2021/07/16 by Christopher T. H. Teo, Teo, Christopher T. H, Ngai‐Man Cheung +1 · 4 citations
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Ethics and Social Impacts of AI #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis #Machine Learning (cs.LG)
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.07754
openalex publication_date 2021/07/16 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Deep generative models have made much progress in improving training stability and quality of generated data. Recently there has been increased interest in the fairness of deep-generated data. Fairness is important in many applications, e.g. law enforcement, as biases will affect efficacy. Central to fair data generation are the fairness metrics for the assessment and evaluation of different generative models. In this paper, we first review fairness metrics proposed in previous works and highlight potential weaknesses. We then discuss a performance benchmark framework along with the assessment of alternative metrics.