2016/08/01 by Julian Birkinshaw, Alexander Zimmermann, Sebastian Raisch · 8 citations
Business, Management and Accounting · Decision Sciences · #Innovation and Knowledge Management #Complex Systems and Decision Making
paper · doi:10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.36
This article develops a conceptual integration of the dynamic capabilities and ambidexterity perspectives in order to understand how firms adapt to discontinuous change. Based on three illustrative case studies, it demonstrates that it is not possible to identify a universal set of dynamic capabilities. Rather, the distinct set of capabilities required depends on which of three modes of adaptation (structural separation, behavioral integration, or sequential alternation) has been prioritized. This article contributes a contingency perspective to dynamic capability research and offers guidance to managers about the alternative approaches they could take when seeking to adapt to environmental discontinuities.