vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

An Analysis of Unsupervised Pre-training in Light of Recent Advances

2014/12/20 by Tom Le Paine, Pooya Khorrami, Paine, Tom Le +5
Computer Science · #Advanced Neural Network Applications #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning and Data Classification #Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE) #cs.CV #cs.LG #cs.NE

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6597

Accepted as a workshop contribution to ICLR 2015

openalex publication_date 2014/12/20 · arxiv created 2015/04/10 · arxiv updated 2015/04/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Convolutional neural networks perform well on object recognition because of a number of recent advances: rectified linear units (ReLUs), data augmentation, dropout, and large labelled datasets. Unsupervised data has been proposed as another way to improve performance. Unfortunately, unsupervised pre-training is not used by state-of-the-art methods leading to the following question: Is unsupervised pre-training still useful given recent advances? If so, when? We answer this in three parts: we 1) develop an unsupervised method that incorporates ReLUs and recent unsupervised regularization techniques, 2) analyze the benefits of unsupervised pre-training compared to data augmentation and dropout on CIFAR-10 while varying the ratio of unsupervised to supervised samples, 3) verify our findings on STL-10. We discover unsupervised pre-training, as expected, helps when the ratio of unsupervised to supervised samples is high, and surprisingly, hurts when the ratio is low. We also use unsupervised pre-training with additional color augmentation to achieve near state-of-the-art performance on STL-10.

Related