vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Offline Reinforcement Learning for Learning to Dispatch for Job Shop Scheduling

2024/09/16 by Jesse van Remmerden, van Remmerden, Jesse, Zaharah Bukhsh +3 · 1 citation
Engineering · #Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Elevator Systems and Control #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.10589

openalex publication_date 2024/09/16 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

The Job Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) is a complex combinatorial optimization problem. While online Reinforcement Learning (RL) has shown promise by quickly finding acceptable solutions for JSSP, it faces key limitations: it requires extensive training interactions from scratch leading to sample inefficiency, cannot leverage existing high-quality solutions from traditional methods like Constraint Programming (CP), and require simulated environments to train in, which are impracticable to build for complex scheduling environments. We introduce Offline Learned Dispatching (Offline-LD), an offline reinforcement learning approach for JSSP, which addresses these limitations by learning from historical scheduling data. Our approach is motivated by scenarios where historical scheduling data and expert solutions are available or scenarios where online training of RL approaches with simulated environments is impracticable. Offline-LD introduces maskable variants of two Q-learning methods, namely, Maskable Quantile Regression DQN (mQRDQN) and discrete maskable Soft Actor-Critic (d-mSAC), that are able to learn from historical data, through Conservative Q-Learning (CQL). Moreover, we present a novel entropy bonus modification for d-mSAC, for maskable action spaces. Moreover, we introduce a novel reward normalization method for JSSP in an offline RL setting. Our experiments demonstrate that Offline-LD outperforms online RL on both generated and benchmark instances when trained on only 100 solutions generated by CP. Notably, introducing noise to the expert dataset yields comparable or superior results to using the expert dataset, with the same amount of instances, a promising finding for real-world applications, where data is inherently noisy and imperfect.

Cited by

Related