vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Measuring The Impact Of Programming Language Distribution

2023/02/03 by Gabriel Orlanski, Kefan Xiao, Orlanski, Gabriel +14 · 13 citations
Computer Science · #Advanced Neural Network Applications #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning and Data Classification #Programming Languages (cs.PL) #Software Engineering Research

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.01973

openalex publication_date 2023/02/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Current benchmarks for evaluating neural code models focus on only a small subset of programming languages, excluding many popular languages such as Go or Rust. To ameliorate this issue, we present the BabelCode framework for execution-based evaluation of any benchmark in any language. BabelCode enables new investigations into the qualitative performance of models' memory, runtime, and individual test case results. Additionally, we present a new code translation dataset called Translating Python Programming Puzzles (TP3) from the Python Programming Puzzles (Schuster et al. 2021) benchmark that involves translating expert-level python functions to any language. With both BabelCode and the TP3 benchmark, we investigate if balancing the distributions of 14 languages in a training dataset improves a large language model's performance on low-resource languages. Training a model on a balanced corpus results in, on average, 12.34% higher pass@k across all tasks and languages compared to the baseline. We find that this strategy achieves 66.48% better pass@k on low-resource languages at the cost of only a 12.94% decrease to high-resource languages. In our three translation tasks, this strategy yields, on average, 30.77% better low-resource pass@k while having 19.58% worse high-resource pass@k.

Cited by

Related