vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Appendicectomy: assessment of stump invagination versus simple ligation: a prospective, randomized trial

1985/12/01 by L Engström, G Fenyö · 4 citations
Medicine · #Anesthesia #Antibiotics #Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management #Appendix #Clinical trial #Incidence (geometry) #Internal medicine #Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions #Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies #Invagination #Ligation #Medicine #Prospective cohort study #Randomized controlled trial #Significant difference #Surgery

paper · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800721212

openalex publication_date 1985/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/26

Abstract

The appendix stump was ligated and doubly invaginated in 374 patients and was simply ligated in 361 in a prospective, randomized trial of 735 consecutive appendicectomies. The two groups were similar with respect to sex, age, degree of appendiceal inflammation and antibiotic treatment. The incidence of wound infection and postoperative pyrexia and the postoperative hospital stay showed no significant intergroup difference. The median operating time was slightly shorter in the group without invagination. Simple ligation facilitates and shortens appendicectomy. It produces no deformation of the caecal wall that subsequently may be mistaken for a caecal neoplasm. Simple ligation is therefore recommended as standard procedure in appendicectomy.

Cited by

Related