2025/08/01 by Craia, Eladio Costantino Pablo, Castro, Caio Fernando de
#Deleuze #Imagination #Ontology #Philosophy of Technology #Simondon
paper · doi:10.15160/2282-5460/2869
This text explores an ontological question within the broader reflection on technology and imagination. Our central inquiry is how imagination can emerge within the predictable and calculable techno-technological sphere rather than examining specific interactions between the two. Given our historical context, both civilizational and technological, this question needs to be distinguished between “technique” and “technology”. While this distinction has been addressed epistemologically, economically, and politically, we focus on its ontological implications. In this sense, we define “technology” as the phenomenological manifestation of technological events, whereas “technique” represents a deeper semantic system shaping our era’s understanding of reality. Consequently, we engage only with technology as a tangible field, while technique remains an overarching mode of being. It is within the technological sphere that imagination finds its real possibility, but its conceptualization belongs to the register of technique. Thus, imagination is produced in technology and can be thought through technique. The ontological conditions enabling imagination within the techno-technological sphere emerge from the tension between Heidegger’s and Simondon-Deleuze’s perspectives on technology. Heidegger sees technique as fundamentally tied to calculable production, foreclosing other modes of world-disclosure, with any “salvation” lying outside technique — perhaps in the poetic. In contrast, Simondon and Deleuze acknowledge the technique’s calculability but emphasize its instability and excess, which allow for unpredictable, imaginative emergence. This duality – technology’s calculable, deterministic nature versus its unpredictable excess – opens space for imagination. The ghost in the machine, the unintended uses of technology, and the unpredictable aspects of the technical world, all contribute to how we “imagine” technology itself. Thus, while technology enforces predictability, its ontological excess enables imagination, shaping our technical understanding of the world.