vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Knowledge Transfer from LLMs to Provenance Analysis: A Semantic-Augmented Method for APT Detection

2025/03/24 by Fei Zuo, Zuo, Fei, Junghwan Rhee +3 · 1 voice · 2 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Computer Science · Decision Sciences · #Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies #Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) #Data Quality and Management #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Semantic Web and Ontologies #cs.CR

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.18316

openalex publication_date 2025/03/24 · arxiv published 2025/03/24 · arxiv updated 2025/03/25 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Advanced Persistent Threats (APTs) have caused significant losses across a wide range of sectors, including the theft of sensitive data and harm to system integrity. As attack techniques grow increasingly sophisticated and stealthy, the arms race between cyber defenders and attackers continues to intensify. The revolutionary impact of Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened up numerous opportunities in various fields, including cybersecurity. An intriguing question arises: can the extensive knowledge embedded in LLMs be harnessed for provenance analysis and play a positive role in identifying previously unknown malicious events? To seek a deeper understanding of this issue, we propose a new strategy for taking advantage of LLMs in provenance-based threat detection. In our design, the state-of-the-art LLM offers additional details in provenance data interpretation, leveraging their knowledge of system calls, software identity, and high-level understanding of application execution context. The advanced contextualized embedding capability is further utilized to capture the rich semantics of event descriptions. We comprehensively examine the quality of the resulting embeddings, and it turns out that they offer promising avenues. Subsequently, machine learning models built upon these embeddings demonstrated outstanding performance on real-world data. In our evaluation, supervised threat detection achieves a precision of 99.0%, and semi-supervised anomaly detection attains a precision of 96.9%.

Cited by

Discussions

Related