vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Meta-Prompting: Enhancing Language Models with Task-Agnostic Scaffolding

2024/01/23 by Mirac Süzgün, Mirac Suzgun, Adam Tauman Kalai +2 · 2 voices · 23 citations
Computer Science · Engineering · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices #Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) #Topic Modeling #cs.AI #cs.CL #cs.HC

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.12954

openalex publication_date 2024/01/23 · arxiv published 2024/01/23 · arxiv updated 2024/01/23 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We introduce meta-prompting, an effective scaffolding technique designed to enhance the functionality of language models (LMs). This approach transforms a single LM into a multi-faceted conductor, adept at managing and integrating multiple independent LM queries. By employing high-level instructions, meta-prompting guides the LM to break down complex tasks into smaller, more manageable subtasks. These subtasks are then handled by distinct "expert" instances of the same LM, each operating under specific, tailored instructions. Central to this process is the LM itself, in its role as the conductor, which ensures seamless communication and effective integration of the outputs from these expert models. It additionally employs its inherent critical thinking and robust verification processes to refine and authenticate the end result. This collaborative prompting approach empowers a single LM to simultaneously act as a comprehensive orchestrator and a panel of diverse experts, significantly enhancing its performance across a wide array of tasks. The zero-shot, task-agnostic nature of meta-prompting greatly simplifies user interaction by obviating the need for detailed, task-specific instructions. Furthermore, our research demonstrates the seamless integration of external tools, such as a Python interpreter, into the meta-prompting framework, thereby broadening its applicability and utility. Through rigorous experimentation with GPT-4, we establish the superiority of meta-prompting over conventional scaffolding methods: When averaged across all tasks, including the Game of 24, Checkmate-in-One, and Python Programming Puzzles, meta-prompting, augmented with a Python interpreter functionality, surpasses standard prompting by 17.1%, expert (dynamic) prompting by 17.3%, and multipersona prompting by 15.2%.

Cited by

Discussions

Related