2025/07/25 by Yusuke Hirota, Boyi Li, Hirota, Yusuke +17 · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · Computer Science · #Closed captioning #Multimodal Machine Learning Applications #Preference #Preference elicitation #Quality (philosophy) #Selection (genetic algorithm) #Subtitles and Audiovisual Media #User modeling #Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
paper · open access · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.19362
published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University)
openalex publication_date 2025/07/25 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have transformed image captioning, shifting from concise captions to detailed descriptions. We introduce LOTUS, a leaderboard for evaluating detailed captions, addressing three main gaps in existing evaluations: lack of standardized criteria, bias-aware assessments, and user preference considerations. LOTUS comprehensively evaluates various aspects, including caption quality (e.g., alignment, descriptiveness), risks (\eg, hallucination), and societal biases (e.g., gender bias) while enabling preference-oriented evaluations by tailoring criteria to diverse user preferences. Our analysis of recent LVLMs reveals no single model excels across all criteria, while correlations emerge between caption detail and bias risks. Preference-oriented evaluations demonstrate that optimal model selection depends on user priorities.