2024/10/01 by Dane Cross, Cross, Dane N., Sánchez, Carles · 1 citation
Physics and Astronomy · #Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics (astro-ph.CO) #FOS: Physical sciences #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.00714
openalex publication_date 2024/10/01 · openalex created_date 2024/10/29 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Current and upcoming imaging galaxy surveys are pushing galaxy samples to higher and higher redshifts. This push will be more pronounced for lens galaxies, for which we only need to measure galaxy positions, not shapes. As a result, we will increasingly often have lens galaxy samples at redshifts higher than those of source galaxies, changing the traditional configuration of galaxy-galaxy lensing (GGL). In this paper, we explore this situation, where lens galaxies are behind source galaxies, which we call inverse galaxy-galaxy lensing (IGGL). We take projected lens and source sample specifications from the Vera Rubin Observatory LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) to compare astrophysical and cosmological constraints between traditional GGL and IGGL. We find IGGL to behave in a different way than GGL, being especially sensitive to lensing magnification, intrinsic alignments (IA) and cosmology, but largely independent of galaxy bias (as opposed to traditional GGL). In this way, we find IGGL can provide independent and robust cosmological constraints without combination with galaxy clustering, and can also probe IA at high redshift and baryonic effects at small scales without being entwined with the effects of non-linear galaxy bias. When combined with cosmic shear, we find IGGL to improve S8 constraints by 25% compared to cosmic shear alone, while also providing tighter and more robust constraints on IA and baryons.