2019/01/24 by Heinz H. Bauschke, Bauschke, Heinz H., Sylvain Gretchko +3
Computer Science · Decision Sciences · Mathematics · #49M20 #49M27 #49M37 #65K05 #65K10 #90C25 #90C26 #90C30 #Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research #FOS: Mathematics #Multi-Criteria Decision Making #Optimization and Control (math.OC) #Optimization and Variational Analysis
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.08183
openalex publication_date 2019/01/24 · openalex created_date 2022/07/30 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Projection methods are popular algorithms for iteratively solving feasibility problems in Euclidean or even Hilbert spaces. They employ (selections of) nearest point mappings to generate sequences that are designed to approximate a point in the intersection of a collection of constraint sets. Theoretical properties of projection methods are fairly well understood when the underlying constraint sets are convex; however, convergence results for the nonconvex case are more complicated and typically only local. In this paper, we explore the perhaps simplest instance of a feasibility algorithm, namely when each constraint set consists of only finitely many points. We numerically investigate four constellations: either few or many constraint sets, with either few or many points. Each constellation is tackled by four popular projection methods each of which features a tuning parameter. We examine the behaviour for a single and for a multitude of orbits, and we also consider local and global behaviour. Our findings demonstrate the importance of the choice of the algorithm and that of the tuning parameter.