2019/02/14 by Devavrat Shah, Shah, Devavrat, Qiaomin Xie +3
Computer Science · Decision Sciences · #Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Optimization and Search Problems #Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.05213
openalex publication_date 2019/02/14 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
In this work, we consider the popular tree-based search strategy within the framework of reinforcement learning, the Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), in the context of infinite-horizon discounted cost Markov Decision Process (MDP). While MCTS is believed to provide an approximate value function for a given state with enough simulations, the claimed proof in the seminal works is incomplete. This is due to the fact that the variant, the Upper Confidence Bound for Trees (UCT), analyzed in prior works utilizes "logarithmic" bonus term for balancing exploration and exploitation within the tree-based search, following the insights from stochastic multi-arm bandit (MAB) literature. In effect, such an approach assumes that the regret of the underlying recursively dependent non-stationary MABs concentrates around their mean exponentially in the number of steps, which is unlikely to hold as pointed out in literature, even for stationary MABs. As the key contribution of this work, we establish polynomial concentration property of regret for a class of non-stationary MAB. This in turn establishes that the MCTS with appropriate polynomial rather than logarithmic bonus term in UCB has the claimed property. Using this as a building block, we argue that MCTS, combined with nearest neighbor supervised learning, acts as a "policy improvement" operator: it iteratively improves value function approximation for all states, due to combining with supervised learning, despite evaluating at only finitely many states. In effect, we establish that to learn an ε approximation of the value function with respect to ℓ_∞ norm, MCTS combined with nearest neighbor requires a sample size scaling as \widetildeO(ε-(d+4)), where d is the dimension of the state space. This is nearly optimal due to a minimax lower bound of \widetildeΩ(ε-(d+2)).