vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Variance-Optimal Arm Selection: Misallocation Minimization and Best Arm Identification

2025/05/17 by Sabrina Khurshid, Gourab Ghatak, Khurshid, Sabrina +3 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Engineering · #Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes #Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML)

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.11985

openalex publication_date 2025/05/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01

Abstract

This paper focuses on selecting the arm with the highest variance from a set of K independent arms. Specifically, we focus on two settings: (i) misallocation minimization setting, that penalizes the number of pulls of suboptimal arms in terms of variance, and (ii) fixed-budget best arm identification setting, that evaluates the ability of an algorithm to determine the arm with the highest variance after a fixed number of pulls. We develop a novel online algorithm called UCB-VV for the misallocation minimization (MM) and show that its upper bound on misallocation for bounded rewards evolves as O(logn) where n is the horizon. By deriving the lower bound on the misallocation, we show that UCB-VV is order optimal. For the fixed budget best arm identification (BAI) setting we propose the SHVV algorithm. We show that the upper bound of the error probability of SHVV evolves as exp(-(n)/(log(K) H)), where H represents the complexity of the problem, and this rate matches the corresponding lower bound. We extend the framework from bounded distributions to sub-Gaussian distributions using a novel concentration inequality on the sample variance and standard deviation. Leveraging the same, we derive a concentration inequality for the empirical Sharpe ratio (SR) for sub-Gaussian distributions, which was previously unknown in the literature. Empirical simulations show that UCB-VV consistently outperforms ε-greedy across different sub-optimality gaps though it is surpassed by VTS, which exhibits the lowest misallocation, albeit lacking in theoretical guarantees. We also illustrate the superior performance of SHVV, for a fixed budget setting under 6 different setups against uniform sampling. Finally, we conduct a case study to empirically evaluate the performance of the UCB-VV and SHVV in call option trading on 100 stocks generated using GBM.

Cited by

Related