vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Lucarelli et al. reply to Tajima et al. (cond-mat 0303493)

2003/03/28 by Andrea Lucarelli, A. Lucarelli, Lucarelli, A. +11
Medicine · Physics and Astronomy · #Actinomycetales infections and treatment #FOS: Physical sciences #Strongly Correlated Electrons (cond-mat.str-el) #Superconductivity (cond-mat.supr-con) #cond-mat.str-el #cond-mat.supr-con

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/0303606

2 pages, 1 figure, submitted to PRL

arxiv created 2003/03/28 · openalex publication_date 2003/03/28 · arxiv updated 2009/11/30 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

In their Comment to a recent paper of ours [Lucarelli et al., PRL 92, 037002 (2003)], Tajima et al. (cond-mat 0303493) argue that the samples of La(2-x)Sr(x)CuO(4) where we find far-infrared peaks below 150 cm-1 (which suggest a charge stripe scenario) are not single crystals or are miscut. Here we show that the spectral feature on which this criticism is based was found both in floating-zone-grown crystals where the miscut was negligible, and in flux-grown crystals where the surface is intrinsically a-b. Further arguments are presented to support the validity of our data.

Related