vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

On When and How to use SAT to Mine Frequent Itemsets

2012/07/26 by Rui Henriques, Henriques, Rui, Inês Lynce +3
Computer Science · #Advanced Database Systems and Queries #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Data Mining Algorithms and Applications #Databases (cs.DB) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Semantic Web and Ontologies

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.6253

openalex publication_date 2012/07/26 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

A new stream of research was born in the last decade with the goal of mining itemsets of interest using Constraint Programming (CP). This has promoted a natural way to combine complex constraints in a highly flexible manner. Although CP state-of-the-art solutions formulate the task using Boolean variables, the few attempts to adopt propositional Satisfiability (SAT) provided an unsatisfactory performance. This work deepens the study on when and how to use SAT for the frequent itemset mining (FIM) problem by defining different encodings with multiple task-driven enumeration options and search strategies. Although for the majority of the scenarios SAT-based solutions appear to be non-competitive with CP peers, results show a variety of interesting cases where SAT encodings are the best option.

Related