2000/04/04 by Spiridon Dumitru, Dumitru, Spiridon
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Physics and Astronomy · #Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis #FOS: Physical sciences #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum Physics (quant-ph) #quant-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0004013
82 pages,1 figure (contaaining a copy of a letter from J.S. Bell)
arxiv created 2000/04/04 · openalex publication_date 2000/04/04 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
In spite \smallskip of their popularity the \QTRbfHeisenberg's (``uncertainty'') \QTRbfRelations (HR) still generate controversies. The \QTRbfTraditional \QTRbfInterpretation of HR (TIHR) dominate our days science, although over the years a lot of its defects were signaled. These facts justify a reinvestigation of the questions connected with the interpretation / significance of HR. Here it is developped such a reinvestigation starting with a revaluation of the main elements of TIHR. So one finds that all the respective elements are troubled by insurmountable defects. Then it results the indubitable failure of TIHR and the necessity of its abandonment. Consequently the HR must be deprived of their quality of crucial physical formulae. Moreover the HR are shown to be nothing but simple fluctuations formulae with natural analogous in classical (non-quantum) physics. The description of the maesuring uncertainties (traditionally associated with HR) is approached from a new informational perspective. The Planck's constant ℏ (also associated with HR) is revealed to have a significance of generic indicator for quantum stochasticity, similarly with the role of Boltzmann's constant k in respect with the thermal stochasticity.