2020/06/20 by Xuan Hua, Hua, Xuan, Jungang Han +17
Engineering · Medicine · Neuroscience · #ECG Monitoring and Analysis #EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces #FOS: Electrical engineering #Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring #Signal Processing (eess.SP) #eess.SP #electronic engineering #information engineering
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.11655
arxiv created 2020/06/20 · openalex publication_date 2020/06/20 · arxiv updated 2020/06/23 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
This paper presents an end-to-end ECG signal classification method based on a novel segmentation strategy via 1D Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to aid the classification of ECG signals. The ECG segmentation strategy named R-R-R strategy (i.e., retaining ECG data between the R peaks just before and after the current R peak) for segmenting the original ECG data into segments in order to train and test the 1D CNN models. The novel strategy mimics physicians in scanning ECG to a greater extent, and maximizes the inherent information of ECG segments. The performance of the classification models for 5-class and 6-class are verified with ECG signals from 48 records of the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. As the heartbeat types are divided into 5 classes (i.e., normal beat, left bundle branch block beat, right bundle branch block beat, ventricular ectopic beat, and paced beat) in the MIT-BIH, the best classification accuracy, the area under the curve (AUC), the sensitivity and the F1-score reach 99.24%, 0.9994, 0.99 and 0.99, respectively. As the heartbeat types are divided into 6 classes (i.e., normal beat, left bundle branch block beat, right bundle branch block beat, ventricular ectopic beat, paced beat and other beats) in the MIT-BIH, the beat classification accuracy, the AUC, the sensitivity, and the F1-score reach 97.02%, 0.9966, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively. Meanwhile, according to the recommended practice from the Association for Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), the heartbeat types are divided into 5 classes (i.e., normal beat, supraventricular ectopic beats, ventricular ectopic beats, fusion beats, and unclassifiable beats), the beat classification accuracy, the sensitivity, and the F1-score reach 97.45%, 0.97, and 0.97, respectively. The experimental results show that the proposed method achieves better performance than the state-of-the-art methods.