vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Morphological Bias: How Ellipticals and Spirals Trace the Cosmic Web Differently

2026/07/17 by Paula S. Ferreira, Carlos A. P. Bengaly, Renyue Cen
#astro-ph.CO #astro-ph.GA

paper · pdf

Abstract

We present a data-driven measurement of galaxy bias and scale-dependent relative bias for elliptical and spiral galaxies using angular auto- and cross-power spectra from DES and DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys DR8. We introduce the cross-tracer clustering ratio (CTCR), which uses the ratio of auto- to cross-power spectra to isolate the relative clustering of morphological tracers as a function of angular multipole ℓ. Across both surveys, ellipticals are more strongly clustered than spirals; the cleanest CTCR constraints come from DESI, where the two morphological samples have better-matched redshift distributions. The difference is scale dependent: the relative bias is close to unity on large angular scales, ℓ \lesssim 50, but increases toward smaller scales, reaching an average separation of 2.6σ at ℓ ∼ 150-200. A complementary linear-bias analysis confirms that ellipticals are positively biased relative to the matter field, while spirals are consistent with weak bias or anti-bias. Unlike narrowly selected LRG samples, our morphologically selected elliptical samples show little redshift evolution, consistent with a broader halo-mass distribution. The results are robust to two covariance estimators, contamination tests, luminosity splits, and comparisons with two N-body mock catalogs. These new findings provide empirical evidence that galaxy morphology imprints both the amplitude and scale dependence of galaxy bias, and establish CTCR as a useful observable for testing halo occupation and assembly-bias models with future imaging surveys.

Citations

Related