2005/07/13 by Y. Charles Li, Li, Y. Charles
Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #35-02 #37-02 #76-02 #Analysis of PDEs (math.AP) #Chaotic Dynamics (nlin.CD) #FOS: Mathematics #FOS: Physical sciences #Fluid Dynamics (physics.flu-dyn) #Mathematical Physics (math-ph) #math-ph #math.AP #math.MP #msc:35-02 #msc:37-02 #msc:76-02 #nlin.CD #physics.flu-dyn
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.math/0507254
7 pages
arxiv created 2005/07/13 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01
In this article, I would like to express some of my views on the nature of turbulence. These views are mainly drawn from the author's recent results on chaos in partial differential equations \citeLi04. Fluid dynamicists believe that Navier-Stokes equations accurately describe turbulence. A mathematical proof on the global regularity of the solutions to the Navier-Stokes equations is a very challenging problem. Such a proof or disproof does not solve the problem of turbulence. It may help understanding turbulence. Turbulence is more of a dynamical system problem. Studies on chaos in partial differential equations indicate that turbulence can have Bernoulli shift dynamics which results in the wandering of a turbulent solution in a fat domain in the phase space. Thus, turbulence can not be averaged. The hope is that turbulence can be controlled.