Response: Comment on "Energy Transfer and Dual Cascade in Kinetic Magnetized Plasma Turbulence"

2011/06/05 by G. G. Plunk, Plunk, G. G., T. Tatsuno +1
Physics and Astronomy · #FOS: Physical sciences #Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics #Magnetic confinement fusion research #Plasma Physics (physics.plasm-ph) #Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1106.0903

openalex publication_date 2011/06/05 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We respond to the recent comment [arXiv:1105.1593] on our Letter [G. G. Plunk and T. Tatsuno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 165003 (2011)]. The comment claims that our argument for spectral transfer direction is incomplete. The comment gives an incomplete account of our argument. We explain how the argument of our Letter, in full, is self-contained consistent and well-supported by numerical evidence. Other technical statements made in the comment are explained to be incorrect. We direct interested readers to our forthcoming article, which should clarify any remaining technical ambiguities and also illuminate deeper physical issues.

Related

• Comment on the numerical measurements of the magnetohydrodynamic turbulence spectrum by A. Beresnyak (Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 075001; MNRAS 422 (2012) 3495; ApJ 784 (2014) L20)
• Comment on Perez et al [PRX 2, 041005 (2012), arXiv:1209.2011]
• Hou et al. Reply to the comment [arXiv:0904.2989] on "Self-Diffusion in 2D Dusty-Plasma Liquids: Numerical-Simulation Results"
• Rejoinder on: Thermostatistics of Overdamped Motion of Interacting Particles
• Comment on Radiation effects on a certain MHD free convection flow, by A. Y. Ghaly and on Chebyshev finite difference method for the effects of chemical reaction, heat and mass transfer on laminar flow along a semi infinite horizontal plate with temperature dependent viscosity, by A.Y. Ghaly and M.A. Seddeek