vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Computer-generated QIS tutorial feedback is valued by students, but does not replicate in-class collaboration

2026/07/16 by Josephine C. Meyer, Steven J. Pollock, Bethany R. Wilcox +1 · 1 voice
#physics.ed-ph

paper · pdf

Abstract

PER has consistently demonstrated the effectiveness of small-group tutorials in helping students develop conceptual understanding and fluency, but instructor uptake is limited by resource constraints. To test the effectiveness of out-of-class tutorials using computer-generated feedback as an instructor-friendly alternative, we conducted think-aloud interviews with students in a quantum computing course who were randomly assigned to either a traditional validated small-group, pencil-and-paper tutorial on tensor products, or a solo computerized adaptation thereof. We found that while the computer-generated feedback was broadly considered useful by students, student engagement patterns were markedly different in the solo setting, with students demonstrating reluctance to use the interface's built-in help features and tending to internalize failure in unproductive ways counter to our intention of a formative learning environment. We discuss implications for curriculum design and directions for future research that may help to answer the longstanding question in PER of why tutorials work so well.

Discussions

Related