vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Can Neural Networks Understand Logical Entailment?

2018/02/23 by David Saxton, Evans, Richard, Saxton, David +6 · 2 citations
Computer Science · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Natural Language Processing Techniques #Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE) #Topic Modeling

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.08535

openalex publication_date 2018/02/23 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We introduce a new dataset of logical entailments for the purpose of measuring models' ability to capture and exploit the structure of logical expressions against an entailment prediction task. We use this task to compare a series of architectures which are ubiquitous in the sequence-processing literature, in addition to a new model class---PossibleWorldNets---which computes entailment as a "convolution over possible worlds". Results show that convolutional networks present the wrong inductive bias for this class of problems relative to LSTM RNNs, tree-structured neural networks outperform LSTM RNNs due to their enhanced ability to exploit the syntax of logic, and PossibleWorldNets outperform all benchmarks.

Citations

Cited by

Related