vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Deontically Constrained Policy Improvement in Reinforcement Learning Agents

2025/06/08 by Makarova, Alena, Abbas, Houssam
#60J10 (Primary) #60J20 (Primary) #60J22 (Primary) #93E20 (Secondary) #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #D.2.4 #F.3.1 #FOS: Computer and information sciences #I.2.8

paper · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.06959

Abstract

Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) are the most common model for decision making under uncertainty in the Machine Learning community. An MDP captures non-determinism, probabilistic uncertainty, and an explicit model of action. A Reinforcement Learning (RL) agent learns to act in an MDP by maximizing a utility function. This paper considers the problem of learning a decision policy that maximizes utility subject to satisfying a constraint expressed in deontic logic. In this setup, the utility captures the agent's mission - such as going quickly from A to B. The deontic formula represents (ethical, social, situational) constraints on how the agent might achieve its mission by prohibiting classes of behaviors. We use the logic of Expected Act Utilitarianism, a probabilistic stit logic that can be interpreted over controlled MDPs. We develop a variation on policy improvement, and show that it reaches a constrained local maximum of the mission utility. Given that in stit logic, an agent's duty is derived from value maximization, this can be seen as a way of acting to simultaneously maximize two value functions, one of which is implicit, in a bi-level structure. We illustrate these results with experiments on sample MDPs.

Citations

Related