2026/06/24 by Tam Hunt · 1 voice
Neuroscience · Physics and Astronomy · #Neural dynamics and brain function #Functional Brain Connectivity Studies #stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
paper · pdf · doi:10.3389/fncom.2026.1738326
The binding problem and the criticality problem represent two of neuroscience's most persistent challenges: how do distributed neural processes create unified conscious experience, and how does the brain maintain optimal information processing at the critical boundary between order and chaos? This paper argues that both problems emerge from neuroscience's "prickly" bias toward discrete, computational approaches and dissolve when we embrace "gooey" electromagnetic field perspectives. Drawing on Alan Watts' philosophical dichotomy between "prickles" (precise, chopped-up particles) and "goo" (softer, continuous waves), I demonstrate how the EM field hypothesis provides natural solutions to spatial and temporal binding through cross-frequency coupling while simultaneously explaining neural criticality through volumetric field propagation. New evidence reveals that electromagnetic fields can entrain neural spike timing at thresholds as low as 0.74 mV/mm, establishing causal field-to-neuron communication. The 5,000-fold speed advantage of ephaptic field propagation (50 km/s vs. 10-100 m/s for spikes) enables rapid integration necessary for unified consciousness, while the volumetric nature of field propagation naturally generates the power-law scaling and critical avalanche dynamics observed across neural systems. Rather than requiring evolutionarily unstable fine-tuning of synaptic weights, criticality arises spontaneously from multi-scale electromagnetic field interactions. The implications extend beyond solving two technical problems to recognizing that cognition and consciousness are probably more gooey than prickly-not made ultimately of discrete computational events but continuous electromagnetic field dynamics produced by the brain and body.