2025/10/03 by Ryan D. Williamson, Florian Justwan · 1 voice · 2 citations
Social Sciences · #Democracy #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Gerrymandering #Populism, Right-Wing Movements #Power (physics) #Redistricting #Social Policy and Reform Studies #State (computer science)
paper · doi:10.1017/spq.2025.10010
published in State Politics & Policy Quarterly 25(4), 361-382 (Cambridge University Press)
openalex publication_date 2025/10/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
Abstract Redistricting is often a hotly contested affair within states as the party in power attempts to maximize its chances for electoral success through injecting partisanship into the process. Previous works have evaluated how different redistricting practices can influence elections, but little is known about how redistricting can impact citizen attitudes toward government. Using an original survey with a unique experiment, we evaluate the relationship between how redistricting is performed and how satisfied citizens are with the state of democracy in the United States. We find that the mere perception of redistricting being done in a partisan manner leads to decreased levels of system support. Furthermore, our models show that independent redistricting commissions tend to reduce the perceived prevalence of gerrymandering and boost citizens’ evaluations of the democratic process.