2020/03/26 by Shantanu Gupta, Zachary C. Lipton, Gupta, Shantanu +3 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Mathematics · #Advanced Causal Inference Techniques #Applied mathematics #Causal inference #Computer science #Confounding #Econometrics #Econometrics (econ.EM) #Estimator #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Economics and business #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Mathematics #Methodology (stat.ME) #Observational study #Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference #Statistical Methods and Inference #Statistics #Variance (accounting) #cs.LG #econ.EM #stat.ME #stat.ML
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.11991
openalex publication_date 2020/03/26 · arxiv created 2021/06/14 · arxiv updated 2021/06/15 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Given a causal graph, the do-calculus can express treatment effects as functionals of the observational joint distribution that can be estimated empirically. Sometimes the do-calculus identifies multiple valid formulae, prompting us to compare the statistical properties of the corresponding estimators. For example, the backdoor formula applies when all confounders are observed and the frontdoor formula applies when an observed mediator transmits the causal effect. In this paper, we investigate the over-identified scenario where both confounders and mediators are observed, rendering both estimators valid. Addressing the linear Gaussian causal model, we demonstrate that either estimator can dominate the other by an unbounded constant factor. Next, we derive an optimal estimator, which leverages all observed variables, and bound its finite-sample variance. We show that it strictly outperforms the backdoor and frontdoor estimators and that this improvement can be unbounded. We also present a procedure for combining two datasets, one with observed confounders and another with observed mediators. Finally, we evaluate our methods on both simulated data and the IHDP and JTPA datasets.