1999/11/10 by M. Girardi, W. Boschin, Girardi, M. +5
Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Astrophysics (astro-ph) #FOS: Physical sciences #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #Scientific Research and Discoveries #astro-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9911180
uses aa.cls (included); 7 pages, 7 eps figures, 1 table. Minor changes. Accepted by A&A
openalex publication_date 1999/11/10 · arxiv created 1999/11/27 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
We measure the two-point redshift-space correlation function of loose groups of galaxies, xiGG, for the combined CfA2 and SSRS2 surveys. Our combined group catalog constitutes the largest homogeneous sample available (885 groups). We compare xiGG with the correlation function of galaxies, xigg, in the same volume. We find that groups are significantly more clustered than galaxies: =1.64+-0.16. A similar result holds when we analyze a volume-limited sample (distance limit 78 h-1 Mpc) of 139 groups. For these groups, with median velocity dispersion sigmav sim 200 km s-1 and mean group separation d sim 16 h-1 Mpc, we find that the correlation length is s0=8+-1 h-1 Mpc, which is significantly smaller than that found for rich clusters. We conclude that clustering properties of loose groups of galaxies are intermediate between galaxies and rich clusters. Moreover, we find evidence that group clustering depends on physical properties of groups: correlation strengthens for increasing sigmav.