2021/07/06 by Sébastien Durost, Durost, Sébastien, Guillaume Reich +3
Computer Science · #Cultural Insights and Digital Impacts #Digital Libraries (cs.DL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction #Library Science and Information Systems #Semantic Web and Ontologies
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2107.05497
openalex publication_date 2021/07/06 · openalex created_date 2021/08/30 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
The HyperTh 'esau and Bibracte num 'erique projects have given rise to a\ncollective effort centred on the use of vocabulary as a means of ensuring the\ninteroperability of archaeological data throughout its life cycle. To this end,\nthe use of the standardised form of the thesaurus -- via the Opentheso platform\n-- provides a tool that is already adapted to the Linked Data. Nevertheless,\nits use quickly raised the question of the different paradigms presiding over\nthe elaboration of a specific vocabulary by each (group of) scientist(s). The\nISO 25964 standard -- designed for the management and interoperability of\nindexing languages -- is flexible enough to permit the comparison and linking\nof different scientific or documentary ``points of view''. Their coherence\nthrough interoperability alignments nevertheless requires to interface\ndifferent semantic granularities: search reporting, the description of raw\ndata, a gateway or ''pivot'' between the two, by using a regulated cooperation\nmethodology. The challenges that remain to be met on this path do not prevent\nthe thesaurus tool from already being a suitable support for a complete\n''human-to-machine-to-human'' interoperability, developed within the framework\nof the Bibracte Ville Ouverte project and exemplified through a research on the\nceramics of that archaeological site.\n