2016/09/15 by Alexander Kholmetskii, Kholmetskii, Alexander, Tolga Yarman +6 · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · Medicine · Neuroscience · Physics and Astronomy · #Biofield Effects and Biophysics #FOS: Physical sciences #General Physics (physics.gen-ph) #Neurology and Historical Studies #Relativity and Gravitational Theory #Twentieth Century Scientific Developments #physics.gen-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.04219
This paper is a rebuttal to the last version arXiv:1904.13252v4
openalex publication_date 2016/09/15 · arxiv created 2019/08/07 · arxiv updated 2019/08/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
We show that a new attempt by C. Corda to once more rehash his so-called "synchronization effect" in order to account for the origin of the extra energy shift between emitted and absorbed radiation in Mossbauer rotor experiments (C. Corda, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, doi: 10.1142/S0218271819501311) is yet again erroneous, just as were his previous attempts (Ann. Phys. 355, 360 (2015); Ann. Phys. 368, 258 (2016); Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27, 1847016 (2018)). The correct approach presented herein with regards to the calculation of the energy shift between emitted and absorbed radiation in a rotating system leads to, as a matter of fact, no specific "synchronization effect".