2025/10/20 by Hendric Voß, Voss, Hendric, Lisa Michelle Bohnenkamp +3
Computer Science · Psychology · #Action Observation and Synchronization #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Hand Gesture Recognition Systems #Hearing Impairment and Communication #Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC)
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.17599
openalex publication_date 2025/10/20 · openalex created_date 2025/10/22 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
This study explores two frameworks for co-speech gesture generation, AQ-GT and its semantically-augmented variant AQ-GT-a, to evaluate their ability to convey meaning through gestures and how humans perceive the resulting movements. Using sentences from the SAGA spatial communication corpus, contextually similar sentences, and novel movement-focused sentences, we conducted a user-centered evaluation of concept recognition and human-likeness. Results revealed a nuanced relationship between semantic annotations and performance. The original AQ-GT framework, lacking explicit semantic input, was surprisingly more effective at conveying concepts within its training domain. Conversely, the AQ-GT-a framework demonstrated better generalization, particularly for representing shape and size in novel contexts. While participants rated gestures from AQ-GT-a as more expressive and helpful, they did not perceive them as more human-like. These findings suggest that explicit semantic enrichment does not guarantee improved gesture generation and that its effectiveness is highly dependent on the context, indicating a potential trade-off between specialization and generalization.