vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

MAC-Gaze: Motion-Aware Continual Calibration for Mobile Gaze Tracking

2025/05/28 by Yaxiong Lei, Lei, Yaxiong, Mingyue Zhao +11 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Engineering · #68T10 #68U35 #C.2.4 #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology #H.1.2 #H.5.2 #Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) #I.5.4 #Inertial Sensor and Navigation

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.22769

openalex publication_date 2025/05/28 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Mobile gaze tracking faces a fundamental challenge: maintaining accuracy as users naturally change their postures and device orientations. Traditional calibration approaches, like one-off, fail to adapt to these dynamic conditions, leading to degraded performance over time. We present MAC-Gaze, a Motion-Aware continual Calibration approach that leverages smartphone Inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors and continual learning techniques to automatically detect changes in user motion states and update the gaze tracking model accordingly. Our system integrates a pre-trained visual gaze estimator and an IMU-based activity recognition model with a clustering-based hybrid decision-making mechanism that triggers recalibration when motion patterns deviate significantly from previously encountered states. To enable accumulative learning of new motion conditions while mitigating catastrophic forgetting, we employ replay-based continual learning, allowing the model to maintain performance across previously encountered motion conditions. We evaluate our system through extensive experiments on the publicly available RGBDGaze dataset and our own 10-hour multimodal MotionGaze dataset (481K+ images, 800K+ IMU readings), encompassing a wide range of postures under various motion conditions including sitting, standing, lying, and walking. Results demonstrate that our method reduces gaze estimation error by 19.9% on RGBDGaze (from 1.73 cm to 1.41 cm) and by 31.7% on MotionGaze (from 2.81 cm to 1.92 cm) compared to traditional calibration approaches. Our framework provides a robust solution for maintaining gaze estimation accuracy in mobile scenarios.

Citations

Cited by

Related