vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Distinguishing “Missing at Random” and “Missing Completely at Random”

1996/08/01 by Daniel F. Heitjan, Srabashi Basu · 216 citations
Computer Science · Mathematics · #Advanced Causal Inference Techniques #Artificial intelligence #Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference #Computer science #Econometrics #Inference #Mathematics #Missing data #Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference #Statistics

paper · doi:10.1080/00031305.1996.10474381

published in The American Statistician 50(3), 207-213 (Taylor & Francis)

openalex publication_date 1996/08/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/03

Abstract

Missing at random (MAR) and missing completely at random (MCAR) are ignorability conditions—when they hold, they guarantee that certain kinds of inferences may be made without recourse to complicated missing-data modeling. In this article we review the definitions of MAR, MCAR, and their recent generalizations. We apply the definitions in three common incomplete-data examples, demonstrating by simulation the consequences of departures from ignorability. We argue that practitioners who face potentially non-ignorable incomplete data must consider both the mode of inference and the nature of the conditioning when deciding which ignorability condition to invoke.

Citations

Cited by

Related