vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Interaction and the Conservation of Gender Inequality: Considering Employment

1997/04/01 by Cecilia L. Ridgeway · 942 citations
Mathematics · Social Sciences · #Demographic economics #Economics #Gender Diversity and Inequality #Gender Politics and Representation #Gender inequality #Inequality #Labour economics #Mathematics #Political science #Social and Intergroup Psychology #Sociology

paper · doi:10.2307/2657301

published in American Sociological Review 62(2), 218 (SAGE Publishing)

openalex publication_date 1997/04/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/03

Abstract

How can we explain the persistence of gender hierarchy over transformations in its socioeconomic base? Part of the answer lies in the mediation of gender inequality by taken-for-granted interactional processes that rewrite inequality into new institutional arrangements. The problems of interacting cause actors to automatically sex-categorize others and, thus, to cue gender stereotypes that have various effects on interactional outcomes, usually by modifying the performance of other, more salient identities. Because changes in the status dimension of gender stereotypes lag behind changes in resource inequalities, interactional status processes can reestablish gender inequalities in new structural forms. Interactional sex categorization also biases the choice of comparison others, causing men and women to judge differently the rewards available to them. Operating in workplace relations, these processes conserve inequality by driving the gender-labeling of jobs, constructing people as gender-interested actors, contributing to employers' discriminatory preferences, and mediating men's and women's perceptions of alternatives and their willingness to settle for given job outcomes.

Cited by

Related