Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting

2002/03/01 by BRANDICE CANES-WRONE, Brandice Canes‐Wrone, David Brady +3 · 26 citations
Social Sciences · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Fiscal Policies and Political Economy #Gender Politics and Representation

paper · doi:10.1017/s0003055402004276

Abstract

Does a typical House member need to worry about the electoral ramifications of his roll-call decisions? We investigate the relationship between incumbents' electoral performance and roll-call support for their party—controlling for district ideology, challenger quality, and campaign spending, among other factors—through a series of tests of the 1956–1996 elections. The tests produce three key findings indicating that members are indeed accountable for their legislative voting. First, in each election, an incumbent receives a lower vote share the more he supports his party. Second, this effect is comparable in size to that of other widely recognized electoral determinants. Third, a member's probability of retaining office decreases as he offers increased support for his party, and this relationship holds for not only marginal, but also safe members.

Citations

• Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers: Adjusted ADA Scores for the U.S. Congress

Cited by

• The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data
• Electoral Accountability for State Legislative Roll Calls and Ideological Representation
• What Happens When Extremists Win Primaries?
• The Consequences of Elite Action Against Elections
• Dynamic Elite Partisanship: Party Loyalty and Agenda Setting in the US House
• American Federalism, Political Inequality, and Democratic Erosion
• The Politics of Loyalty: Understanding Voters’ Attitudes after Primary Elections
• Back-Channel Representation: A Study of the Strategic Communication of Senators with the US Department of Labor
• Partisan communication in two-stage elections: the effect of primaries on intra-campaign positional shifts in congressional elections
• Nationalization and Its Consequences for State Legislatures
• Appropriators not Position Takers: The Distorting Effects of Electoral Incentives on Congressional Representation
• Political Parties and Representation of the Poor in the American States
• Public opinion foundations of the clean energy transition
• Lights, Camera, Inaction? The Effects of Gavel-to-Gavel Floor Coverage on U.S. State Legislatures
• On the Decline of Elite-Educated Republicans in Congress
• Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison
• Responsive rhetoric: Evidence from congressional redistricting
• Press Coverage and Accountability in State Legislatures
• Using Bayesian Aldrich‐McKelvey Scaling to Study Citizens' Ideological Preferences and Perceptions
• Members of Parliament are Minimally Accountable for Their Issue Stances (and They Know It)
• Election-Denying Republican Candidates Underperformed in the 2022 Midterms
• Divisions at Home, Broken Promises Abroad? How Domestic Politics Shapes the United States’ Nuclear Credibility
• Do Donors Punish Extremist Primary Nominees? Evidence from Congress and American State Legislatures
• Policy, Position-Taking, and Congressional Voting under Judicial Review
• Polarization, candidate positioning, and political participation in the U.S.
• Responding to whom? An experimental study of the dynamics of responsiveness to interest groups and the public. [europepmc]

Related

• Electoral Accountability for State Legislative Roll Calls and Ideological Representation
• Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress
• How Do Electoral Incentives Affect Legislator Behavior? Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures
• Dynamic Elite Partisanship: Party Loyalty and Agenda Setting in the US House
• Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel