Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress
2010/08/01 by JOSEPH BAFUMI, Joseph Bafumi, MICHAEL C. HERRON +1 · 23 citations
Social Sciences · #Electoral Systems and Political Participation #Judicial and Constitutional Studies #Gender Politics and Representation
paper · doi:10.1017/s0003055410000316
Abstract
We consider the relationship between the preferences of American voters and the preferences of the U.S. legislators who represent them. Using an Internet-based, national opinion survey in conjunction with legislator voting records from the 109th and 110th Congresses, we show that members of Congress are more extreme than their constituents, i.e., that there is a lack of congruence between American voters and members of Congress. We also show that when a congressional legislator is replaced by a new member of the opposite party, one relative extremist is replaced by an opposing extremist. We call this leapfrog representation, a form of representation that leaves moderates with a dearth of representation in Congress. We see evidence of leapfrog representation in states and House districts and in the aggregate as well: the median member of the 109th House was too conservative compared to the median American voter, yet the median of the 110th House was too liberal. Thus, the median American voter was leapfrogged when the 109th House transitioned to the 110th. Although turnover between the 109th and 110th Senates occurred at approximately the same rate as between the 109th and 110th Houses, the Senate appears to be a more moderate institution whose median member does not move as abruptly as that of the House.
Citations
Cited by
- Electoral Accountability for State Legislative Roll Calls and Ideological Representation
- What Happens When Extremists Win Primaries?
- Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization
- Idiosyncratic Issue Opinion and Political Choice
- Partisan communication in two-stage elections: the effect of primaries on intra-campaign positional shifts in congressional elections
- Does Inattention to Political Debate Explain the Polarization Gap between the U.S. Congress and Public?
- News Sharing on Social Media: Mapping the Ideology of News Media, Politicians, and the Mass Public
- News Sharing on Social Media: Mapping the Ideology of News Media, Politicians, and the Mass Public
- Which Republican Constituencies Support Restrictive Abortion Laws? Comparisons Among Donors, Wealthy, and Mass Publics
- Entrepreneurs of conflict: A descriptive analysis of when and how political elites use divisive rhetoric
- VRscores: A New Measure and Data Set of Workforce Politics Using Voter Registrations
- Blessing or curse? A critical review of the paradoxical consequences of direct public funding for political parties
- Mass Versus Donor Attitudes on the Importance of Supreme Court Nominations
- Partisan Differences in the Sharing of Low-Quality News Sources by U.S Political Elites
- Preventative Polarization: Republican Senators’ Positional Adaptation in the Tea Party Era
- Public Opinion and Policy Representation: On Conceptualization, Measurement, and Interpretation
- Bias in Cable News: Persuasion and Polarization
- Do Donors Punish Extremist Primary Nominees? Evidence from Congress and American State Legislatures
- Welfare, egalitarianism, and polarization: the politics of noncontributory social programs
- Polarization, candidate positioning, and political participation in the U.S.
- The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers: Variation in Ideological Homophily in Online Networks
- Adaptive political surveys and GPT-4: Tackling the cold start problem with simulated user interactions. [europepmc]
- Foreign policy free agents: how lawmakers and coalitions on the political margins help set boundaries for US foreign policy. [europepmc]
Related