vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Differentially Private Space-Efficient Algorithms for Counting Distinct Elements in the Turnstile Model

2025/05/29 by Rachel Cummings, Alessandro Epasto, Cummings, Rachel +9
Computer Science · #Cryptography and Data Security #Cryptography and Security (cs.CR) #Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning and Algorithms #Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.23682

openalex publication_date 2025/05/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

The turnstile continual release model of differential privacy captures scenarios where a privacy-preserving real-time analysis is sought for a dataset evolving through additions and deletions. In typical applications of real-time data analysis, both the length of the stream T and the size of the universe |U| from which data come can be extremely large. This motivates the study of private algorithms in the turnstile setting using space sublinear in both T and |U|. In this paper, we give the first sublinear space differentially private algorithms for the fundamental problem of counting distinct elements in the turnstile streaming model. Our algorithm achieves, on arbitrary streams, Oη(T1/3) space and additive error, and a (1+η)-relative approximation for all η∈ (0,1). Our result significantly improves upon the space requirements of the state-of-the-art algorithms for this problem, which is linear, approaching the known Ω(T1/4) additive error lower bound for arbitrary streams. Moreover, when a bound W on the number of times an item appears in the stream is known, our algorithm provides Oη(√(W)) additive error, using Oη(√(W)) space. This additive error asymptotically matches that of prior work which required instead linear space. Our results address an open question posed by [Jain, Kalemaj, Raskhodnikova, Sivakumar, Smith, Neurips23] about designing low-memory mechanisms for this problem. We complement these results with a space lower bound for this problem, which shows that any algorithm that uses similar techniques must use space Ω(T1/3) on arbitrary streams.

Citations

Related