2010/04/18 by Eugen Perchik, Perchik, Eugen
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Social Sciences · #Business #Economic Development and Digital Transformation #Economic and Technological Developments in Russia #Economics #FOS: Economics and business #Financial crisis #General Finance (q-fin.GN) #Interpretation (philosophy) #Keynesian economics #Macroeconomics #Neoclassical economics #Philosophy #Positive economics #Russia and Soviet political economy #Section (typography) #q-fin.GN
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1004.3067
published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University) · 12 pages
arxiv created 2010/04/18 · openalex publication_date 2010/04/18 · arxiv updated 2010/04/20 · openalex created_date 2021/02/01 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
The main points of the first section of the article written by S.I.\nChernyshov, A.V. Voronin and S.A. Razumovsky arXiv:1003.4382), which deals with\nthe fundamental bases of the macroeconomic theory, have been analyzed. An\nincorrectness of the Harrod's model of the economical growth in its generally\naccepted interpretation was specifically considered. The inevitability of the\neconomic crisis has been shown to follow directly from the premises of this\nmodel. At the same time there is an opportunity to realize the damping\nstrategies.\n