vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Parsimonious Argument Annotations for Hate Speech Counter-narratives

2022/08/01 by Damian A. Furman, Furman, Damian A., Pablo Torres +11
Computer Science · #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2208.01099

openalex publication_date 2022/08/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We present an enrichment of the Hateval corpus of hate speech tweets (Basile et. al 2019) aimed to facilitate automated counter-narrative generation. Comparably to previous work (Chung et. al. 2019), manually written counter-narratives are associated to tweets. However, this information alone seems insufficient to obtain satisfactory language models for counter-narrative generation. That is why we have also annotated tweets with argumentative information based on Wagemanns (2016), that we believe can help in building convincing and effective counter-narratives for hate speech against particular groups. We discuss adequacies and difficulties of this annotation process and present several baselines for automatic detection of the annotated elements. Preliminary results show that automatic annotators perform close to human annotators to detect some aspects of argumentation, while others only reach low or moderate level of inter-annotator agreement.

Related