A local hidden-variable model violating Bell's inequalities: a reply to Matzkin

2008/07/11 by R. N. Nijhoff, Nijhoff, R. N. · 2 citations
Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Bell test experiments #Computer science #Continuous variable #Hidden variable theory #Local hidden variable theory #Mathematical analysis #Mathematical economics #Mathematics #Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence #Physics #Quantum #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum entanglement #Quantum mechanics #Quantum nonlocality #Statistical Mechanics and Entropy #Statistical physics #Statistics #Theoretical physics #Variable (mathematics) #quant-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0807.1815

published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University)

arxiv created 2008/07/11 · openalex publication_date 2008/07/11 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

Recently, Matzkin claimed the construction of a hidden variable (HV) model which is both local and equivalent with the quantum-mechanical predictions. In this paper we will briefly present this HV model and argue, by identifying an extra non-local "hidden" HV, why this model is not local

Cited by

• Classical counterexample to Bell's theorem

Related

• Proof of Bell's Inequalities for Generalized Hidden Variables Models
• Concerning an old (but still quite alive) rebuttal of the theorem of John Bell
• Defining the local part of a hidden variable model: a comment
• Explicit construction of Local Hidden Variables for any quantum theory up to any desired accuracy
• Hidden Variable Models for Quantum Theory Cannot Have Any Local Part