vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Model-Powered Conditional Independence Test

2017/09/18 by Rajat Sen, Ananda Theertha Suresh, Sen, Rajat +6 · 3 citations
Computer Science · Mathematics · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Information Theory (cs.IT) #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Machine Learning and Algorithms #Statistical Methods and Inference

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1709.06138

openalex publication_date 2017/09/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We consider the problem of non-parametric Conditional Independence testing (CI testing) for continuous random variables. Given i.i.d samples from the joint distribution f(x,y,z) of continuous random vectors X,Y and Z, we determine whether X ⊥ Y | Z. We approach this by converting the conditional independence test into a classification problem. This allows us to harness very powerful classifiers like gradient-boosted trees and deep neural networks. These models can handle complex probability distributions and allow us to perform significantly better compared to the prior state of the art, for high-dimensional CI testing. The main technical challenge in the classification problem is the need for samples from the conditional product distribution fCI(x,y,z) = f(x|z)f(y|z)f(z) -- the joint distribution if and only if X ⊥ Y | Z. -- when given access only to i.i.d. samples from the true joint distribution f(x,y,z). To tackle this problem we propose a novel nearest neighbor bootstrap procedure and theoretically show that our generated samples are indeed close to fCI in terms of total variational distance. We then develop theoretical results regarding the generalization bounds for classification for our problem, which translate into error bounds for CI testing. We provide a novel analysis of Rademacher type classification bounds in the presence of non-i.i.d near-independent samples. We empirically validate the performance of our algorithm on simulated and real datasets and show performance gains over previous methods.

Cited by

Related