Reply on Toke's and Schroeder's comment on our paper "Statistical nature of multifragmentation"

1998/08/03 by A. S. Botvina, A. Botvina, Botvina, A. +2
Decision Sciences · Physics and Astronomy · #FOS: Physical sciences #Grey System Theory Applications #Nuclear Experiment (nucl-ex) #Nuclear Theory (nucl-th) #nucl-ex #nucl-th

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.nucl-th/9808004

Reply on the comment by Toke and Schroeder nucl-th/9807066

arxiv created 1998/08/03 · openalex publication_date 1998/08/03 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We point out some basic misunderstandings and wrong statements about our microcanonical Metropolis Monte Carlo (MMMC) model of nuclear fragmentation.

Related

• Nuclear statistics, microcanonical or canonical? The physicists vs. the chemists approach
• Multifragmentation at Intermediate Energy: Dynamics or Statistics?
• Note on Breakup Densities in Fragmentation
• Multifragmentation and the Renormalization Group
• Links Between Different Models for Multifragmentation