2025/11/26 by Bozdag, Sena, Roy, Olivier
Arts and Humanities · Social Sciences · #Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies #Logic in Computer Science (cs.LO) #Philosophical Ethics and Theory
paper · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.21261
openalex publication_date 2025/11/26 · openalex created_date 2025/11/28 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
We revisit a recent puzzle about common knowledge, the ``sailboat" case (Lederman, 2018), and argue that Lewisian common knowledge allows us to reconcile the pre-theoretical intuition that certain facts are ``public" in such situations, while these facts cannot be common knowledge in the classical, iterative sense. The crux of the argument is to understand Lewisian common knowledge as an account of what it means for an event to be public. We first formulate this argument informally to clarify its philosophical commitment and then propose one way to capture it formally in epistemic-plausibility models. Taken together, we take the philosophical and the formal arguments as providing evidence that Lewisian common knowledge is a plausible account of what it means for an event to be public.