vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Arrangements of ideal type

2016/06/02 by Roehrle, Gerhard
#14N20 #20F55 #52B30 #52C35 #Combinatorics (math.CO) #FOS: Mathematics #Group Theory (math.GR)

paper · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.00617

Abstract

In 2006 Sommers and Tymoczko defined so called arrangements of ideal type AI stemming from ideals I in the set of positive roots of a reduced root system. They showed in a case by case argument that AI is free if the root system is of classical type or G2 and conjectured that this is also the case for all types. This was established only recently in a uniform manner by Abe, Barakat, Cuntz, Hoge and Terao. The set of non-zero exponents of the free arrangement AI is given by the dual of the height partition of the roots in the complement of I in the set of positive roots, generalizing the Shapiro-Steinberg-Kostant theorem. Our first aim in this paper is to investigate a stronger freeness property of the AI. We show that all AI are inductively free, with the possible exception of some cases in type E8. In the same paper, Sommers and Tymoczko define a Poincaré polynomial I(t) associated with each ideal I which generalizes the Poincaré polynomial W(t) for the underlying Weyl group W. Solomon showed that W(t) satisfies a product decomposition depending on the exponents of W for any Coxeter group W. Sommers and Tymoczko showed in a case by case analysis in type A, B and C, and some small rank exceptional types that a similar factorization property holds for the Poincaré polynomials I(t) generalizing the formula of Solomon for W(t). They conjectured that their multiplicative formula for I(t) holds in all types. Here we show that this conjecture holds inductively in almost all instances.

Related