2025/12/20 by John C. Forbes, Harvey Butler, Forbes, John C. +1 · 5 voices
Physics and Astronomy · #Astro and Planetary Science #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae #astro-ph.EP #astro-ph.GA #astro-ph.IM
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.18341
openalex publication_date 2025/12/20 · openalex created_date 2025/12/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
The third macroscopic interstellar object detected in the solar system recently passed through perihelion, with the best-fitting models of its trajectory now featuring non-gravitational accelerations. We assess how much mass loss is required to produce plausible non-gravitational acceleration solutions and compare with estimates of the mass loss. We find that they are consistent when the nucleus of 3I/ATLAS is around 1 km in diameter. For a recent solution with a time lag in the acceleration from Eubanks et al, we find diameters between 820 meters and 1050 meters, assuming an outgassing asymmetry factor ζ=0.5 and a density of the comet nucleus ρ=0.5 g cm-3. The limits on the diameter scale as (ζ/ρ)1/3. Substantial extrapolation is required in general to compare non-gravitational accelerations to mass loss rates, so reliable estimates of the mass loss rate at other stages of the comet's trajectory will substantially reduce the systematic uncertainty in this estimate.