2026/06/15 by Jonathan Judd, Jeffrey P. Spence, Nikhil Milind +3 · 1 voice
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · #Evolution and Genetic Dynamics #Genetic Associations and Epidemiology #Genomics and Rare Diseases
paper · doi:10.1093/genetics/iyag150
The classic theory of mutation-selection balance predicts the equilibrium frequency of genetic variation under negative selection. The model predicts a simple relationship between the total frequency of deleterious variants, mutation rate, and strength of selection, with different functions for recessive and (co-)dominant genes. In this study, we investigate whether genes associated with human recessive disorders fit the predictions of this classic model. By comparing observed frequencies of loss of function variants (LoFs) to those expected under mutation-selection balance we find that, for nearly all recessive genes, the observed frequencies are too low to be explained by purely recessive selection. Analyzing the effects of heterozygous LoFs on quantitative traits from the UK Biobank, we find that recessive disease genes have widespread quantitative effects in heterozygotes. Together, these results suggest that for a large proportion of recessive disease genes, the majority of selection acting on pathogenic mutations appears to operate through heterozygotes. We conclude that very few human genes follow the classic model of recessive mutation-selection balance.