2024/08/21 by Sharath Turuvekere Sreenivas, Saurav Muralidharan, Sreenivas, Sharath Turuvekere +41 · 3 voices · 26 citations
Computer Science · Engineering · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #Extraction and Separation Processes #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics #Mineral Processing and Grinding #cs.AI #cs.CL #cs.LG
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.11796
openalex publication_date 2024/08/21 · arxiv published 2024/08/21 · arxiv updated 2024/12/09 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
We present a comprehensive report on compressing the Llama 3.1 8B and Mistral NeMo 12B models to 4B and 8B parameters, respectively, using pruning and distillation. We explore two distinct pruning strategies: (1) depth pruning and (2) joint hidden/attention/MLP (width) pruning, and evaluate the results on common benchmarks from the LM Evaluation Harness. The models are then aligned with NeMo Aligner and tested in instruct-tuned versions. This approach produces a compelling 4B model from Llama 3.1 8B and a state-of-the-art Mistral-NeMo-Minitron-8B (MN-Minitron-8B for brevity) model from Mistral NeMo 12B. We found that with no access to the original data, it is beneficial to slightly fine-tune teacher models on the distillation dataset. We open-source our base model weights on Hugging Face with a permissive license.