1997/07/01 by Israel Hershkovitz, Israël Hershkovitz, Bruce Latimer +6 · 6 citations
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Arts and Humanities · #Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments #Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies #dental development and anomalies
paper · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-8644(199707)103:3<393::aid-ajpa8>3.0.co;2-r
The controversy over the reliability of ectocranial suture status (open vs. closed) as an age estimation stimulated the pursuit of Meindl and Lovejoy's suggestion (Meindl and Lovejoy [1985] Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 68:57-66) for large scale analysis. The extent of the sagittal suture closure was assessed in 3,636 skulls from the Hamann-Todd and Terry collections. The debate over whether cranial suture ossification represents a pathologic or an age-predictable pathologic process also stimulated a comparison with age and two stress markers, hyperostosis frontalis interna and tuberculosis. Sagittal suture closure was found to be age-independent and sexually biased. The wide confidence intervals (for age) appear to preclude meaningful application of suture status for age determination. No correlation was found with the tested biological stressors.